![]() In the past, world history was mainly about struggles between the monarchs, nations and ideologies, such as that was seen within the Western Civilization. In addition, the clash of civilizations, represents a development of history. It is to set forth to descriptive hypothesis as to what the future may be like.” According to the theory Huntington says that, “This is not to advocate the desirability of conflicts between civilizations. As an extension, he tells that the concept of different civilizations, as highest category of the cultural identity, will become increasingly useful for analyzing the potential of conflict. In his thesis, he argued that primary axis of conflict in future will be along the cultural lines. Huntington believed that while the age of the ideology had ended, the world had only reverted to a normal state of the affairs which is characterized by cultural conflict. Specifically, Francis Fukuyama argued that world had reached the ‘end of the history’ in a Hegelian sense. Some theorists argued that human rights, liberal democracy, and the capitalist free market economy had been the only remaining ideological alternative for the nations in the post–Cold War world. Huntington began his thinking by surveying the diverse theories related to the nature of global politics in the post–Cold War period. ![]() The theory of the clash of civilization was proposed at the American Enterprise Institute in a 1992 lecture, which was then developed in a 1993 Foreign Affairs article titled “The Clash of Civilizations?”. ![]() Huntington argued that future wars would be fought not between the countries, but between cultures. The American political scientist Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations is the thesis that says that people’s cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post–Cold War era.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |